tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post1127848716498112603..comments2024-01-18T17:01:11.357-05:00Comments on quickhidehere.blogspot.com: Doomhammer 2010: Digital Final and Problems with LabelsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-86420721620785572192010-03-27T13:54:35.721-04:002010-03-27T13:54:35.721-04:00It's a bit late, but "mixed media." ...It's a bit late, but "mixed media." It's all encompassing, not confusing, and if people want clarity on the exact mediums and techniques used then that's easily explained in your post.Colin Boyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03493906327477069827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-22530145197082173562010-02-27T02:26:10.359-05:002010-02-27T02:26:10.359-05:00You're a master!!!! Amazing stuff, really beau...You're a master!!!! Amazing stuff, really beautiful!!!! I'll link you on my blog.Emanuela Lupacchinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01654788412206057134noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-83876120297483751092010-02-13T21:10:40.581-05:002010-02-13T21:10:40.581-05:00Thank you for clearing that up! It was continually...Thank you for clearing that up! It was continually amazing what you managed to pull from WC and digital, but this carries a lot of explanation in it. It's essentially what I use PS for as well, post-WC phase. Nice to know I'm not alone in that. : )Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05618062431476386822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-75751750208055493902010-02-07T18:37:56.413-05:002010-02-07T18:37:56.413-05:00Your blog is great. And this is a really nice piec...Your blog is great. And this is a really nice piece!Craig Phillipshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13295709372173004147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-48598156840785438022010-02-04T16:11:07.151-05:002010-02-04T16:11:07.151-05:00Most excellent!
I for one would love to see the o...Most excellent!<br /><br />I for one would love to see the oil version eaten up and digested through your digital voodoo cheater trickery.<br /><br />Or better yet some sort of sick hybrid between the "watercolor and the "oil,".....then using your sorceress digital magic to give birth to something so abominable that students would cringe in horror at the audacity!Jared Shearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14879406947140189516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-81825604478407038622010-02-03T17:03:00.921-05:002010-02-03T17:03:00.921-05:00This is great, I love the tiny red specks on blue
...This is great, I love the tiny red specks on blue<br />people who think using digital ways of altering 'traditional' paint are just whiney and probably a bit jealous of you.Fossforhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15366256644768056704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-51303582606402348852010-02-03T15:00:27.118-05:002010-02-03T15:00:27.118-05:00Justin
First things first. These students giving ...Justin<br /><br />First things first. These students giving you flak for being "misleading" need to understand that experimentation is crucial and that there are no rules with this sort of thing. There is no 1 way to paint with a medium and working with it however you or anybody else feels comfortable is what enriches the art world with unique and individualistic works. <br /><br />Secondly, I think the image looks great! I've always enjoyed your work and I totally am with you on Photoshop vs Painter. They both are similar and able to handle "painting" but as far as digital painting is concerned, I think Painter has the advantage. Not to say that people can't do amazing, painterly things with PS, I just like the look of Painter way more.<br /><br />I'm looking forward to seeing how the piece turns out in oils! Best of luck, I think this is a great experiment and people should open their eyes and ears when you're posting these things up. You have a great amount of knowledge to share, sir. Thanks for the awesome post.<br /><br />EricEric Braddockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357831950779008573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-6163015109133713242010-02-03T10:59:53.752-05:002010-02-03T10:59:53.752-05:00Maybe it's a digitized ink wash? ha! BTW, what...Maybe it's a digitized ink wash? ha! BTW, what kind of scanner do you have that will scan a 12x18 digitized ink wash?RobArthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04785888105245668961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-63253831239065341562010-02-02T03:29:11.138-05:002010-02-02T03:29:11.138-05:00Its not watercolor thats for sure.Its not watercolor thats for sure.laurghitahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12274921567652877045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-88796926039200396682010-02-01T19:08:15.075-05:002010-02-01T19:08:15.075-05:00photoshop will, of course, never replicate traditi...photoshop will, of course, never replicate traditional mediums as well as painter has- but adobe has managed to work their meager brush engine into a very reliable and powerful beast. it runs fast and smooth with a fairly robust set of customization options. painter, on the other hand, tends to have a lag problem at higher resolutions and its surprisingly prone to crash for such elegant and labored over software. i think that sense of reliability shows in photoshops dominance of the concept art industry. concept art being commercial art, that dominance also shows photoshops lack of intrinsic artistic feel heh<br /><br />i dont think the two need to be inspected separately, really. just different pencils you dig around in your pocket and pull out at the proper times. like how Foster and the like do it, i suppose.<br /><br />i have to agree with Ben too- their misunderstanding is not your fault, thats for sure.<br /><br />keep up the good work !Joshua Godinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05394859692459008301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-32934190590847437462010-02-01T15:21:20.919-05:002010-02-01T15:21:20.919-05:00Justin,
First off, this piece is looking fantastic...Justin,<br />First off, this piece is looking fantastic! I'm a huge fan of your process and even picked up the ImagineFX article to learn more. I think the Watercolor / Digital is a very appropriate label. As you explained the strengths of photoshop, I know you have mentioned before that these types of painting would be impossible if it were not for the texture of the watercolor. You have been very up front with your technique, and I appreciate that very much as a student.nicholashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14329637259897415286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-81970349477464196372010-02-01T15:17:33.732-05:002010-02-01T15:17:33.732-05:00Nice job, whatever you call it.Nice job, whatever you call it.Larry MacDougallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18017987999024372121noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-60161463199120067242010-02-01T12:44:06.994-05:002010-02-01T12:44:06.994-05:00I believe you have been very clear on your mediums...I believe you have been very clear on your mediums. <br /><br />And the silly students need to learn... That's why we call the students.<br /><br />Keep up the awesome work.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11351029657374262480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-23330032942056426922010-02-01T11:34:05.565-05:002010-02-01T11:34:05.565-05:00A good label would be:
Hard Work/Any Medium that ...A good label would be:<br /><br />Hard Work/Any Medium that Suits Your Purpose.<br /><br />I think it should be understood by those who are confused that watercolor (or inks) are used in this case as the main basis of the painting, and the original painting is the springboard for the digital -enhancement-. <br /><br />Am I right?Will Kellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11776250635500898092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-86815126845839657182010-02-01T10:10:16.217-05:002010-02-01T10:10:16.217-05:00This one is very nice!
If a have to choose betwee...This one is very nice!<br /><br />If a have to choose between 3 almost-equal images, oil is the king of painting (you have both transparency-opacity). IMHO, like comparing a real sax to a midi sax :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23140677.post-44606643222717373602010-02-01T09:31:10.852-05:002010-02-01T09:31:10.852-05:00I think this version if excellent.
BTW, I think y...I think this version if excellent.<br /><br />BTW, I think you have been pretty clear as to your mediums.aintshakespearehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13007855291548401824noreply@blogger.com